What are some ways to tell the difference between
a cult and a legitimate Christian church?
Some simple criteria are listed below for examining a group’s
beliefs, attitudes, and actions.
CRITERION ONE: Rejection of the doctrine that has been
passed down from the beginning through the apostles and the inspired
authors of Scripture (
2 Timothy 1:13-14 ;
Titus 1:9 ).
Jesus said:
I tell you the truth, the man who does not enter the sheep pen
by the gate, but climbs in by some other way, is a thief and a
robber (John 10:1).
Does the group accept the Bible as the written Word of God, or does
it consider other documents of equal or greater importance than
Scripture? Does Scripture provide the basis for its doctrine and the
values of its members, or do leaders arbitrarily set the standards? The
principles of Christian liberty and the priesthood of the believer can
only be honored when Scripture is the ultimate judge of values.
A group that denies such basic doctrines as the Trinity, the deity of
Christ, the reality of a bodily resurrection, and salvation by grace
alone through faith in Christ is clearly a cult.
CRITERION TWO: Unbiblical leadership
Jesus said:
Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s
clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. By their fruit you
will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs
from thistles? Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad
tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad
tree cannot bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good
fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus, by their fruit you
will recognize them (Matthew 7:15-20).
A healthy Christian group has leaders of good character who uphold
biblical standards for church discipline (
1 Corinthians 5:9-13 ). Leaders of integrity "produce fruit
in keeping with repentance" (
Matthew 3:8 ;
Mark 4:20 ;
Luke 6:43-49 ;
Ephesians 5:1-11 ;
Colossians 1:10 ). Although no leaders are perfect (
2 Corinthians 4:1-7 ), good leaders:
Superficially, cult leaders may appear trustworthy. However, on
closer examination they are disturbed men or women of questionable
motives and methods— unscrupulous, manipulative, authoritarian, and
immoral. They claim excessive personal authority, deny the principles of
Christian liberty and the priesthood of the believer, and ignore the
pattern Jesus established for settling conflicts within the church (
Matthew 18:15-17 ). Closer observation usually reveals that
they are enslaved to sin in some obvious way: adulterers, liars,
intimidators, slanderers, sexual addicts, substance abusers.
CRITERION THREE: Unhealthy group pressure and hostility to
the truth
No group of people is perfectly dedicated to the truth. The
corruption of the "the cravings of sinful man, the lust of his eyes and
the boasting of what he has and does" (
1 John 2:16 ) infects every congregation to some degree.
Further, because every church is made up of a variety of people with a
wide range of backgrounds, interests, and capacities, each will have a
unique perspective. Differences in viewpoint and occasional errors are
to be expected. But beyond such predictable imperfections, there are
reasonable expectations that any legitimate church should fulfill.
A healthy church will deal with criticism or questions regarding its
point of view openly, honestly, and patiently. (Some churches can be
cult-like in their rigidity and defensiveness without being
full-blown cults.) Cults, on the other hand, are defensive, evasive, or
belligerent to an extreme when reasonable questions are raised. They
foster an atmosphere of spiritual bondage through legalism and group
intimidation (
2 Peter 2:1-20 ). Many cults forbid their members to read
literature that questions or disagrees with their own unique point of
view. 1
CRITERION FOUR: Does the group separate itself from
outsiders on the basis of arbitrary, unbiblical standards?
A healthy Christian group practices biblically defined separation
from the world (
Matthew 5:20; John 17:15 ;
1 Corinthians 5:9-13 ). Cults,in contrast, often encourage
their members to isolate themselves from the world in unbiblical ways.
They will often encourage members to avoid contact with other Christians
or even family members who don’t belong to their particular group. They
will define membership on the basis of an arbitrary list of "do’s and
don’ts." Anyone not willing to agree to the list is treated as an
outsider.
The apostle Paul expressed a biblical attitude toward cultural truth
when he said:
Though I am free and belong to no man, I make myself a slave to
everyone, to win as many as possible (1 Corinthians 9:19).
All the standards listed above are important, but some are more
essential than others. The first is crucial. Any departure from
confidence in the authority of Scripture, orthodox doctrine, or
salvation by grace through faith in Christ alone is a sure sign of a
cult. Groups that fail the first test will almost always fail the last
three as well. On the other hand, some groups that are not cults in the
strictest sense due to their formal adherence to the first standard
might be seriously deficient in one or more of the last three. In such a
case the group should still be considered "cultic" or "cult-like," and
avoided.
Written by: Dan
Vander Lugt |